University College London Administrative Law and the Ombudsman Essay
Description
Answer ONE of the following questions:
1. ‘Administrative justice is better delivered out of the courtroom for reasons
of expediency, practicality and efficiency.’
Critically evaluate this statement in relation to judicial review OR the
Ombudsman.
2. “A narrower test of standing [for judicial review] will restrict the court’s ability to
deal with issues of public importance and undermine the rule of law. …. If this
occurs it will be a significant retrograde step in our law that is likely to increase
costs and delays and undermine the flexibility of the judicial review system. No
case has been made which justifies restricting the current approach to
standing.”
V. Bondy and M. Sunkin, ‘How Many JRs are too many? An evidence based
response to ‘Judicial Review: Proposals for Further Reform’’ UK Const. L. Blog
(26th October 2013) (available at http://ukconstitutionallaw.org)
Critically evaluate the merits of restricting the rules on standing in judicial
review cases in light of proposals for reform over recent years.
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."
