UMB Sleep Health and Predicted Cognitive Effectiveness Critique Discussion
Description
Research Article Critique. 3 – 4 pages.
Included here are the rubric, and an article that describe the components of a research article and what you are looking for when you critique it. Hope this helps explain more.
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: Research Article Critique Rubric
| Proficient | Competent | Needs Improvement | Unsatisfactory | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of Research | Points:1 (6.66666%)
Correctly identifies type of research — quantitative or qualitative. Fully explains the aspects that determine its type of research. |
Points:0.8 (5.33333%) Correctly identifies type of research — quantitative or qualitative. Partially explains the aspects that determine its type of research. |
Points:0.5 (3.33333%) Contains some incorrect information about the type of research. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Contains mostly incorrect information about the type of research or omits research type. |
| Significance of Issue |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Fully discusses the significance of the issue studied in the research article. |
Points:0.8 (5.33333%) Adequately discusses the significance of the issue studied in the research article. |
Points:0.5 (3.33333%) Does not adequately discuss the significance or has some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits significance or has a lot of incorrect information. |
| Literature Search |
Points:2 (13.33333%) Fully discusses the completeness of the literature search, its relevance, and its currency. |
Points:1.6 (10.66666%) Adequately discusses the completeness of the literature search, its relevance, and its currency. |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Does not adequately discuss the completeness of the literature search or has some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits discussion of literature search or has a lot of incorrect information. |
| Sample |
Points:2 (13.33333%) Correctly identifies the sample (n). Fully describes the sample and fully discusses of the sample selection method. |
Points:1.6 (10.66666%) Correctly identifies the sample (n). Adequately describes the sample and adequately discusses of the sample selection method. |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Incorrectly identifies the sample (n). Does not adequately describes the sample and/or inadequately discusses of the sample selection method. Or contains some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits discussion of sample or has a lot of incorrect information. |
| Data Collection |
Points:2 (13.33333%) Fully discusses data collection in the research article. |
Points:1.6 (10.66666%) Adequately discusses data collection in the research article. |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Does not adequately discuss data collection in the research article or has some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits discussion of data collection or has a lot of incorrect information |
| Results |
Points:2 (13.33333%) Summarizes results well and concisely. |
Points:1.6 (10.66666%) Adequately summarizes results. |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Does not adequately summarize results or has some incorrect information |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits summary of results or has a lot of incorrect information. |
| Practice |
Points:2 (13.33333%) Fully discusses how the research can be used in practice. |
Points:1.6 (10.66666%) Adequately discusses how the research can be used in practice. |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Does not adequately discuss how the research can be used in practice or has some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits discussion of how the research can be used in practice or has a lot of incorrect information. |
| Limitations |
Points:2 (13.33333%) Correctly and fully identifies and discusses the limitations of the research. |
Points:1.6 (10.66666%) Correctly and adequately identifies and discusses the limitations of the research. |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Does not adequately identify and discuss the limitations of the research or has some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits discussion of the limitation of the research or has a lot of incorrect information. |
| Further Study |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Correctly and fully identifies and discusses the needs for further study of this issue. |
Points:0.8 (5.33333%) Adequately identifies and discusses the needs for further study of this issue. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Does not adequately identify and discuss the needs for further study of this issue or has some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits discussion of the needs for further study of this issue or has a lot of incorrect information. |
Name:Research Article Critique Rubric
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."
Complete the 
Complete the order payment after filling in the order form. We’ll receive your order and assign it to a writer.
The assigned writer will complete your paper and forward it to our Editing Team for review and approval.
Once approved by the editor, the completed paper will be uploaded to your account for you to download, review and approve.