UMB Sleep Health and Predicted Cognitive Effectiveness Critique Discussion
Description
Research Article Critique. 3 – 4 pages.
Included here are the rubric, and an article that describe the components of a research article and what you are looking for when you critique it. Hope this helps explain more.
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: Research Article Critique Rubric
| Proficient | Competent | Needs Improvement | Unsatisfactory | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of Research | Points:1 (6.66666%)
Correctly identifies type of research — quantitative or qualitative. Fully explains the aspects that determine its type of research. |
Points:0.8 (5.33333%) Correctly identifies type of research — quantitative or qualitative. Partially explains the aspects that determine its type of research. |
Points:0.5 (3.33333%) Contains some incorrect information about the type of research. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Contains mostly incorrect information about the type of research or omits research type. |
| Significance of Issue |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Fully discusses the significance of the issue studied in the research article. |
Points:0.8 (5.33333%) Adequately discusses the significance of the issue studied in the research article. |
Points:0.5 (3.33333%) Does not adequately discuss the significance or has some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits significance or has a lot of incorrect information. |
| Literature Search |
Points:2 (13.33333%) Fully discusses the completeness of the literature search, its relevance, and its currency. |
Points:1.6 (10.66666%) Adequately discusses the completeness of the literature search, its relevance, and its currency. |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Does not adequately discuss the completeness of the literature search or has some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits discussion of literature search or has a lot of incorrect information. |
| Sample |
Points:2 (13.33333%) Correctly identifies the sample (n). Fully describes the sample and fully discusses of the sample selection method. |
Points:1.6 (10.66666%) Correctly identifies the sample (n). Adequately describes the sample and adequately discusses of the sample selection method. |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Incorrectly identifies the sample (n). Does not adequately describes the sample and/or inadequately discusses of the sample selection method. Or contains some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits discussion of sample or has a lot of incorrect information. |
| Data Collection |
Points:2 (13.33333%) Fully discusses data collection in the research article. |
Points:1.6 (10.66666%) Adequately discusses data collection in the research article. |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Does not adequately discuss data collection in the research article or has some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits discussion of data collection or has a lot of incorrect information |
| Results |
Points:2 (13.33333%) Summarizes results well and concisely. |
Points:1.6 (10.66666%) Adequately summarizes results. |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Does not adequately summarize results or has some incorrect information |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits summary of results or has a lot of incorrect information. |
| Practice |
Points:2 (13.33333%) Fully discusses how the research can be used in practice. |
Points:1.6 (10.66666%) Adequately discusses how the research can be used in practice. |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Does not adequately discuss how the research can be used in practice or has some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits discussion of how the research can be used in practice or has a lot of incorrect information. |
| Limitations |
Points:2 (13.33333%) Correctly and fully identifies and discusses the limitations of the research. |
Points:1.6 (10.66666%) Correctly and adequately identifies and discusses the limitations of the research. |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Does not adequately identify and discuss the limitations of the research or has some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits discussion of the limitation of the research or has a lot of incorrect information. |
| Further Study |
Points:1 (6.66666%) Correctly and fully identifies and discusses the needs for further study of this issue. |
Points:0.8 (5.33333%) Adequately identifies and discusses the needs for further study of this issue. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Does not adequately identify and discuss the needs for further study of this issue or has some incorrect information. |
Points:0 (0.00%) Omits discussion of the needs for further study of this issue or has a lot of incorrect information. |
Name:Research Article Critique Rubric
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."
