University of Winnipeg Business Essay

Answer the four (4) following questions. Each question will be worth 25% of your overall  grade. It  is worth 40% of your overall grade for the course.  Please, no title pages for tests. You MUST cite wherever you are glossing/using another person’s ideas. I do not have a preference for how you cite (any style – Chicago, MLA, APA is fine), but you MUST CITE. Make it clear where you are citing another’s position and where you are advancing your own position.

1) Schönfeld and Gardiner Readings: (i) elaborate three objections to Schönfeld‘s main argument (these cannot be objections outlined in the reading itself or by Williston in their analysis before and after the main reading) and (ii) elaborate three arguments in support of Schönfeld‘s main argument (these cannot be arguments outlined in the reading itself or by Williston in their analysis before and after the main reading). (iii) Elaborate three reasons that show how Gardiner’s main argument or any of their sub-arguments challenge Schönfeld‘s main argument (these cannot be arguments outlined in the readings themselves or by Williston in their analysis before and after the main readings) and (iv) elaborate three reasons that show how Gardiner’s or any of their sub-arguments support Schönfeld‘s main argument (these cannot be arguments outlined in the readings themselves or by Williston in their analysis before and after the main readings).

2) (i) Elaborate three ways in which Simon’s reading challenges the main argument of the Ehrenfeld reading (these challenges cannot be found in the Simon or Ehrenfeld readings themselves or in Williston’s commentaries on either reading) and (ii) elaborate two ways in which the YouTube video posted as to be watched alongside the Ehrenfeld reading challenges Simon’s main argument and (iii) elaborate how the video challenges Ehrenfeld’s main argument.

3. For EACH of the previously posted videos,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZIJZMS5BUQ

(militant French eco-activists)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyYjI7zQlaA

(local eco-entrepreneurships)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8VXyfcs0l0

(eco-activism and the age of terror)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdeHUrL1FEM

(i) elaborate two arguments that show how the video connects to the Litke reading’s main argument (since there are four videos, you should be providing a total of eight arguments here – two per video) and (ii) elaborate two arguments that show how the video connects to the Stefanovic reading’s main argument (since there are four videos, you should be providing a total of eight arguments here – two per video).

4. With reference to the following YouTube videos on the impact of fast fashion on the environment that were previously posted,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bB3kuuBPVys&t=5s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhPPP_w3kNo

(i) use any arguments contained in the required readings to argue that fast fashion IS morally permissible and (ii) create and elaborate YOUR OWN arguments to argue that fast fashion is morally permissible.