SMC Political Science Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Essay
Description
Compare/contrast two or more readings from a given week.
You may reference any/all of the readings for a given week. Be succinct, compelling and incisive. What is something interesting, peculiar or discrepant in comparing two or more of the week’s readings? How does the noted difference matter? How does the difference or omission cause you to doubt the validity of one or more of the author’s argument(s)? How would you know if they are wrong or you are wrong? Write these documents expecting the reader/grader to try and disagree with you.
Why States Want WMD
– Barnaby. “What Does It Take to Make a WMD?” How to Build…, 63-88.
PLUS AT LEAST ONE (1) OF THE ADDITIONAL READINGS:
– Scott Sagan. 1996/1997. “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in
Search of a Bomb.” International Security 21(3): 54-86.
– Etel Solingen. 1994. “The Political Economy of Nuclear Restraint,” International
Security 19(2):126-169.
– Nina Tannenwald. 1999. “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative
Basis for Nonuse.” International Organization 53(3):433-468.
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."
