short response
Description
Write a short (1-2 pages, maximum), correctly formatted memorandum in Word that analyzes each of the two procedural artifacts you found and submitted in the previous link. Explain what criteria, specifically, from the readings explain what makes strong procedural texts (whether text-dominant or multimedia, such as a video) that you observed in each item and describe how the artifact met that criterium in a manner you feel is successful. Be sure to analyze and describe examples of at least two criteria for each of the artifacts you selected.
I strongly recommend using the Rule of Threes (as always!) but separating the memo’s body into two sections that are clearly labeled: one for the text-dominant item and one for the video. You are welcome to use a table or bulleted list to present the criteria you considered when selecting these and descriptions/examples of why you feel that they were successful in those criteria if you feel that is the best way to present the information.
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."
