Define the problem or issue, in this case, it is the “Parental Rights in Education Bill”. Highlight the urgency and state significant findings for the problem based on the evidence. Objectivity is your priority, so resist the urge to overstate. Use credible resources and specific evidence. 

Analyze the evidence do not just present it, Show how you arrived at the findings or recommendations through analysis of qualitative data. Draw careful conclusions that make sense of the data and do not misrepresent it. Use credible sources and cite specific evidence in MLA format. 

Address: counterarguments, caveats, alternatives, interpretations, and reservations to your findings or recommendations. Your Credibility as a policy analyst relies on your ability to locate and account for counterarguments. You should be especially sensitive to the likely counterarguments that a decision-maker would face in implementing or acting on your recommendations or findings. Use credible sources and specific evidence.   

Summarize your position: your findings or state recommendations or findings in response to specific problems and avoid generalizations. Suggest next steps and the implications of the findings or recommendations. You may address the feasibility of the next steps or explore the implications of your analysis. Use credible sources and specific evidence as needed.

Highlight the most important aspects of the conclusions: succinctly in a concluding section and remind the decision-maker of the big-picture, the overall goal, the necessity, or urgency of action. This answers the “Who cares?” question that reminds the reader of the value of the research and recommendations. If you are targeting a decision-maker, you should reflect the decision-maker’s primary concerns.