Miami Dade College Healthcare Data Security Essay
Description
REQUIREMENTS
A. Create a health information management (HIM) environmental scan report by doing the following:
1. Select an emerging issue or trend in the field of HIM to investigate from one of the following HIM domains:
2. Explain why you chose to investigate the issue or trend from part A1.
3. Analyze 5–7 professional sources (e.g., professional interviews, peer-reviewed HIM journals, literature, articles, professional organizations or associations) that are relevant and aligned to the chosen issue or trend from part A1.
Note: Your submission should include a variety of different professional sources. The sources selected should not all come from the same type of sources (e.g., all personal interviews or all articles).
4. Analyze your chosen issue or trend from part A1 by doing the following:
a. Explain how your issue or trend evolved within the field of HIM.
b. Describe the healthcare setting of your issue or trend.
i. Explain how your issue or trend influences HIM in the chosen healthcare setting described in part A4b.
c. Discuss the roles of key stakeholders involved in the issue or trend.
d. Explain how the issue or trend affects the field of HIM.
e. Discuss two challenges related to the issue or trend in the field of HIM.
i. Discuss how each challenge from part A4e could be resolved.
5. Describe an experience you have had or could obtain related to the chosen issue or trend from part A1.
Note: If you have not had any related experience, then explain how you could get experience.
6. Research an organization that has been affected by your chosen issue or trend from part A1, then do the following:
a. Explain the impact of the issue or trend on the organization you researched.
b. Describe your perspective on how the organization handled the issue or trend.
i. Justify your position on the organization’s handling or mishandling of the issue or trend.
B. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
RUBRIC
NOT EVIDENT An emerging issue or trend in the field of HIM is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The selected emerging issue or trend in the field of HIM does not appropriately address 1 of the given HIM domains. |
COMPETENT The selected emerging issue or trend in the field of HIM appropriately addresses 1 of the given HIM domains. |
A2:WHY THE ISSUE OR TREND WAS CHOSEN
NOT EVIDENT An explanation of why the issue or trend from part A1 was chosen to be investigated is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The explanation does not logically address why the issue or trend from part A1 was chosen to be investigated. |
COMPETENT The explanation logically addresses why the issue or trend from part A1 was chosen to be investigated. |
NOT EVIDENT An analysis of 5–7 professional sources is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The analysis of the 5–7 different professional sources contains 1 or more sources that are not relevant or not aligned to the chosen issue or trend from part A1. Or the analysis does not logically explain how each source is relevant and aligned to the chosen issue or trend from part A1. |
COMPETENT The analysis includes 5–7 different professional sources that are relevant and aligned to the chosen issue or trend from part A1. The analysis logically explains how each source is relevant and aligned to the chosen issue or trend from part A1. |
A4A:HOW THE ISSUE OR TREND EVOLVED
NOT EVIDENT An explanation of how the issue or trend evolved within the field of HIM is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The explanation does not logically or accurately address how the issue or trend evolved within the field of HIM. |
COMPETENT The explanation logically and accurately addresses how the issue or trend evolved within the field of HIM. |
NOT EVIDENT A description of the healthcare setting of the issue or trend is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The description of the healthcare setting of the issue or trend is not realistic or is not relevant to the issue or trend. |
COMPETENT The description of the healthcare setting of the issue or trend is realistic and relevant to the issue or trend. |
A4BI:HOW THE ISSUE OR TREND INFLUENCES THE HEALTHCARE SETTING
NOT EVIDENT An explanation of how the issue or trend influences the chosen healthcare setting from part A4b is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The explanation does not logically address how the issue or trend influences HIM in the chosen healthcare setting from part A4b. |
COMPETENT The explanation logically addresses how the issue or trend influences HIM in the chosen healthcare setting from part A4b. |
NOT EVIDENT A discussion of the roles of key stakeholders involved in the issue or trend is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The discussion does not logically address the roles of key stakeholders involved in the issue or trend. |
COMPETENT The discussion logically addresses the roles of key stakeholders involved in the issue or trend. |
A4D:IMPACT OF THE ISSUE OR TREND
NOT EVIDENT An explanation of how the issue or trend affects the field of HIM is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The explanation does not logically address how the issue or trend affects the field of HIM. |
COMPETENT The explanation logically addresses how the issue or trend affects the field of HIM. |
A4E:CHALLENGES OF THE ISSUE OR TREND
NOT EVIDENT A discussion of 2 challenges related to the issue or trend in the field of HIM is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The discussion does not logically address 2 challenges related to the issue or trend in the field of HIM. |
COMPETENT The discussion logically addresses 2 challenges related to the issue or trend in the field of HIM. |
A4EI:HOW THE CHALLENGES COULD BE RESOLVED
NOT EVIDENT A discussion of how each challenge from part A4e could be resolved is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The discussion does not logically address how each challenge from part A4e could be resolved. |
COMPETENT The discussion logically addresses how each challenge from part A4e could be resolved. |
A5:EXPERIENCE RELATED TO THE ISSUE OR TREND
NOT EVIDENT A description of an experience the learner has had or could obtain related to the chosen issue or trend from part A1 is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The description of the learner’s experience is not relevant to the chosen issue or trend from part A1. Or if the learner has not had previous experience, the description does not logically explain how the learner could obtain experience relevant to the chosen issue or trend from part A1. |
COMPETENT The description of the learner’s experience is relevant to the chosen issue or trend from part A1. Or if the learner has not had previous experience, the description logically explains how the learner could obtain experience relevant to the chosen issue or trend from part A1. |
A6A:IMPACT OF THE ISSUE OR TREND
NOT EVIDENT An explanation of the impact of the issue or trend on the organization researched is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The explanation does not logically address the impact of the issue or trend on the organization researched. |
COMPETENT The explanation logically addresses the impact of the issue or trend on the organization researched. |
A6B:HOW THE ORGANIZATION HANDLED THE ISSUE OR TREND
NOT EVIDENT A description of the learner’s perspective on how the organization handled the issue or trend is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The description of the learner’s perspective does not logically address how the organization handled the issue or trend. |
COMPETENT The description of the learner’s perspective logically addresses how the organization handled the issue or trend. |
A6BI:JUSTIFY THE POSITION
NOT EVIDENT A justification of the learner’s position on the organization’s handling or mishandling of the issue or trend is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The justification of the learner’s position on the organization’s handling or mishandling of the issue or trend is not realistic, or it does not logically explain the handling or mishandling of the issue or trend. |
COMPETENT The justification of the learner’s position on the organization’s handling or mishandling of the issue or trend is realistic and logically explains the handling or mishandling of the issue or trend. |
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style. |
COMPETENT The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style. |
NOT EVIDENT Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. |
COMPETENT Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding. |
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."