HU Cases Critique Discussion

Request: This work consists of case critique (there are 13 cases which are listed below which need to be approached). Each case should be presented in 1 page (double spaced, Times New Roman – so 1 page for each case). Each case has to be on a separate page with the title of the case.Use the format below:

• Name of the Case
• Statement of the Facts
• The Issues/Questions
• Rule
• Application
• Conclusion

Cases ( they are public, well known cases which you can easily locate through a google search)

• Case Critique of New Jersey v. TLO (CC8)
• Case Critique of Carey v. Piphus (CC9)
• Begin Case Critique of Brown v Topeka Board of Education
• Case critique of Florence County v. Carter (CC11)
• Hoyem v. Manhattan Beach City Sch. Dist. (CC13)
• Perry v. Sindermann (CC14)
• Case Critique of Pickering v Board of Education (CC15)
• Case Critique of Cleveland v Loudermill (CC16
• Case critique of Serrano v Priest (I&II) (CC19)
• Case Critique of San Antonio School District v Rodriguez (CC20)
• Case Critique of TInker vs Des Moines (CC7)
• Case Critique of Roberts -v- City of Boston
• Case Critique of Plessy -v- Ferguson.