California State University Northridge Parents v Epic Games Article Questions
Question Description
I’m working on a business law discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
This week in chapter 14, you learned about several ways someone can void a contract based on the argument that they either (1) did not understand they were getting into a contract at the time of the agreement, or (2) they were not capable of understanding the terms of the agreement and/or their consequences due to their age, mental incompetence, or intoxication. Read this (Links to an external site.) article linked below, and answer the following questions.
1. Who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant in this case? What remedy(s) are the plaintiffs asking for?
2. Which aspect of “capacity” are the plaintiffs in this case claiming was missing? Explain why.
3. Do you think the contracts should be voided? Explain why.
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."
