Arizona State University Performance Assessment Essay
admin one
Arizona State University Performance Assessment Essay
Description
Annotated Bibliography Check-In
Following the Annotated Bibliography Guidelines below, upload a minimum of 5 entries for review.
****Only do 5 entries on school-wide assessment data*****
**Create an annotated bibliography with a minimum of 20 entries focusing on an assessment related topic. Five (5) of the entries must focus on assessment at the subject or grade-level team, school-wide assessment data, or assessment professional development for educators.
Some examples of topics might include performance and project assessment in the classroom, the history of standardized assessments in the United States, formative assessment and instruction, communicating with students and parents about assessment, student assessment, and teacher evaluation, etc.
This assignment is mandatory for satisfactory completion of this class and will be graded P/F.
Save the file as Annotated Bibliography Draft1_LASTNAME_FIRST INITIAL.docx
No Plagiarism
Rubric
Mastery Check Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conventions
5to >4.0 pts
Exemplary
Demonstrates excellent use of standard writing conventions: spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence construction, paragraphing, grammar and usage with virtually no errors. • Sentences are structured effectively, employ rich vocabulary, and vary in length and style. • Thoroughly edited and prepared
4to >3.0 pts
Professional
Demonstrates competent use of standard writing conventions with few minor errors • Sentences are structured well, convey intended meaning, but may lack variety or richness. • Well edited and prepared considering time limits.
3to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Demonstrates inconsistent use of standard writing conventions though effort is evident. • Sentence structure varies, but attempts to use complex sentences may be ineffective. • Effort has been made to edit and prepare final draft, but may lack thoroughness or quality.
0 pts
No Marks
Demonstrates poor use of standard writing conventions: Numerous errors or a pattern of errors indicate lack of understanding or care. • Sentence structures are simplistic or misused. • Poorly edited or formatted for intended purpose. Preparation reflects a lack of effort or attention.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization
5to >4.0 pts
Exemplary
Ideas are sequenced in a logical way that strongly supports the reader’s understanding and the writer’s intent. • Use of headings, paragraphs, and transitions help clarify main points. • Organization reflects strong grasp of intended text structure (e.g., persuasive, reflective, expository, etc.)
4to >3.0 pts
Professional
Ideas are sequenced in a logical way with only occasional digression or ambiguity. • Headings, paragraphs, and transitions are correctly used but basic. • Organization is appropriate for the text structure but unsophisticated.
3to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Though readable, Ideas are sequenced inconsistently or illogically; content may be confusing or lack cohesion. • Headings, paragraphs, and transitions are used inconsistently or ineffectively • Organization reflects very basic understanding of text structure or purpose
0 pts
Unacceptable
No apparent organization of ideas: Writing is difficult to follow. • Headings, paragraphs, and transitions are not used or are used incorrectly. • Organization reflects little understanding of the text structure or purpose.
5 pts
Total Points: 10
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."
